DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1601
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NRO7810-14
13 January 2015
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 December 2014. After careful consideration of
your application, the Board concluded that your application was
not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of
justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina
timely manner. Although you claim that you had the “cutting
score” (points) to be promoted the E-5 effective 1 September
1987, you in fact, did not have a high enough cutting score to
advance in September 1987, see enclosure (1). Therefore, the
Board did not believe it was in the interest of equity or
fairness to grant your request.
You may request reconsideration of this decision within one year
from the date of the Board’s decision. However, your request
must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not
reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
Further, the evidence must pertain to the timeliness of your
application or to its merits. Absent such additional evidence,
further review of your application is not possible.
Sincerely
ROBERT J. O’NETLL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00433-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by MC memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2, 13 February 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06319-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400/3 l’II4PR-2, 30 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02505-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2011. In an effort to ascertain whether you would have advanced or not from the September 2010 cycle (if you had taken the MME exam), the raw exam score that you achieved on the March 2011 MME exam was applied to the remainder of your profile For the September 2010 cycle. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04832-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05516-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. selectee.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05529-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 5529-01 25 September 2001 _.- This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06836-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings -of this Board. in the Marine Corps without prior approval of the Commandant of You were I the Marine Corps. composite score 0 1993 promotion 1992 in his PM0 promotion to co not have the re service record indicates that he had a or the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08002-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400/3 1~4MPR-2, 11 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a) XXXX requestback pay from 1 April 2003 through 6 September 2003 due to a promotion to sergeants.2. Based on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02107-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 7 July 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer was denied the opportunity to compete 3 for advancement in examination cycle 168, September 2000.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00080-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...